10 165 Further Notes and Views: Difference between revisions
From Knot Atlas
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>Back to [[10 165]]</noinclude><br> |
<noinclude>Back to [[10 165]]</noinclude><br> |
||
{| |
|||
|- valign=top |
|||
{{Knot View Template| |
|||
image = 10crossing-2trefoil.png | |
|||
text = Symmetrical depiction using only circular arcs, and lines which are horizontal, vertical, or at a 45° angle.}} |
|||
|} |
|||
<font size=+1 color=red>'''Warning.'''</font> In 1973 K. Perko noticed that the knots that were later labeled 10<sub>161</sub> and 10<sub>162</sub> in Rolfsen's tables (which were published in 1976 and were based on earlier tables by Little (1900) and Conway (1970)) are in fact the same. In our table we removed Rolfsen's 10<sub>162</sub> and renumbered the subsequent knots, so that our 10 crossings total is 165, one less than Rolfsen's 166. Read more: [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PerkoPair.html] [http://www.math.cuhk.edu.hk/publect/lecture4/perko.html] [http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/~bjs/Perko-page.html] [http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~jms/Videos/ke/images.html] |
|||
<font size=+1 color=red>'''Warning.'''</font> In 1974 K. Perko |
|||
[http://knotplot.com/perko/]. |
|||
noticed that the knots labeled [[10_161]] and [[10_162]] in |
|||
Rolfsen's tables are in fact the same. In our table we removed his |
|||
10<sub>162</sub> and renumbered the subsequent knots, so that our 10 |
|||
crossings total is 165, one less than Rolfsen's 166. Read more: [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PerkoPair.html] |
|||
[http://www.math.cuhk.edu.hk/publect/lecture4/perko.html] [http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/~bjs/Perko-page.html] [http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~jms/Videos/ke/images.html]. |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 8 August 2013
Back to 10 165
Warning. In 1973 K. Perko noticed that the knots that were later labeled 10161 and 10162 in Rolfsen's tables (which were published in 1976 and were based on earlier tables by Little (1900) and Conway (1970)) are in fact the same. In our table we removed Rolfsen's 10162 and renumbered the subsequent knots, so that our 10 crossings total is 165, one less than Rolfsen's 166. Read more: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
