User talk:Drorbn: Difference between revisions
(Bicentennial emblem) |
(Borromean chain-mail knot?) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:P.S., the "Shirt seen in Lisboa" at http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/Talks/Oporto-0407/KnotsInLisboa.html is actually a partial view of a monochromatic version of the U.S. Bicentennial emblem of 1976. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bicentlogo.png |
:P.S., the "Shirt seen in Lisboa" at http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/Talks/Oporto-0407/KnotsInLisboa.html is actually a partial view of a monochromatic version of the U.S. Bicentennial emblem of 1976. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bicentlogo.png |
||
==Borromean chain-mail knot?=== |
|||
Which knot number is the "Borromean chain mail" knot? It's not L10a169, but I'm having difficulty determining which it actually is... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 15:49, 27 Mar 2006 (EST) |
|||
[[Image:Borromean-chain-mail.gif]] |
|||
Revision as of 15:49, 27 March 2006
Hello again, Mr. Bar Natan. Thank you for helping me out with my problem. Dr. Conant said that your two examples were similar to his. Anyway, Dr. Conant told me that he became interested in knot theory because you showed up at a presentation he attended. I hope your knot theory career remains a successful one.
Strongbad, 2006-03-14 09:58-05:00
Clarification?
Hi, I just e-mailed you about the "Borromean" bathroom tile, but then realized I could have more easily left a comment here...
Anyway, on the main page, you should probably make it clear that the Rolfsen table is for single-loop knots, while the Thistlewaite table is for multi-loop knots (for people who don't already know that in advance). Thanks. AnonMoos 00:21, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)
- P.S., the "Shirt seen in Lisboa" at http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/Talks/Oporto-0407/KnotsInLisboa.html is actually a partial view of a monochromatic version of the U.S. Bicentennial emblem of 1976. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bicentlogo.png
Borromean chain-mail knot?=
Which knot number is the "Borromean chain mail" knot? It's not L10a169, but I'm having difficulty determining which it actually is... AnonMoos 15:49, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)
