Heegaard Floer Knot Homology: Difference between revisions

From Knot Atlas
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 70: Line 70:
<!--$$K1 = Knot["K11n34"]; K2 = Knot["K11n42"];
<!--$$K1 = Knot["K11n34"]; K2 = Knot["K11n42"];
test[invt_] := (invt[K1] =!= invt[K2]);
test[invt_] := (invt[K1] =!= invt[K2]);
test /@ {
test /@ {Alexander, MultivariableAlexander, Jones, HOMFLYPT,
Kauffman, Kh, HFKHat}$$-->
Alexander, MultivariableAlexander, Jones, HOMFLYPT, Kauffman, Kh, HFKHat
}$$-->
<!--Robot Land, no human edits to "END"-->
<!--Robot Land, no human edits to "END"-->
{{InOut|
{{InOut|

Revision as of 19:57, 18 December 2007


Stop hand.png This page is still under construction.
Use the information here at your own risk. You can check the history of the page to see how recently it has been worked on, and who has been contributing. Feel free to remove this notice if it seems appropriate!

In 2007, Jean-Marie Droz of the University of Zurich (working along with Anna Beliakova) wrote a Python program to compute the (hat-version) Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology of a knot . His program is integrated into KnotTheory`, though to run it, you must have Python as well as the Python library Psycho installed on your system.

(For In[1] see Setup)

In[1]:= ?HFKHat
HFKHat[K][t,m] returns the Poincare polynomial of the Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology (hat version) of the knot K, in the Alexander variable t and the Maslov variable m.
In[2]:= HFKHat::about
The Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology program was written by Jean-Marie Droz in 2007 at the University of Zurich, based on methods of Anna Beliakova's arXiv:07050669.

The Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology is a categorification of the Alexander polynomial. Let us test that for the knot 8_19:

In[3]:= hfk = HFKHat[K = Knot[8, 19]][t, m]
Out[3]= 2 -3 m 5 2 6 3 m + t + -- + m t + m t 2 t
In[4]:= {hfk /. m -> -1, Alexander[K][t]}
Out[4]= -3 -2 2 3 -3 -2 2 3 {1 + t - t - t + t , 1 + t - t - t + t }

The knot 8_19 is the first knot in the Rolfsen Knot Table whose Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology is not "diagonal". Let us test that. The homology is "on diagonal", iff its Poincare polynomial, evaluated at , is a monomial:

In[5]:= Select[AllKnots[{3, 8}], (Head[HFKHat[#][t, 1/t]] == Plus) &]
Out[5]= {Knot[8, 19]}
In[6]:= hfk /. m -> 1/t
Out[6]= 4 -2 -- + t 3 t
K11n34.gif
K11n34
K11n42.gif
K11n42

The Conway knot K11n34 and the Kinoshita-Terasaka knot K11n42 are a mutant pair, and are notoriously difficult to tell apart. Let us check that an array of standard knot polynomials fails to separate them, yet succeeds:

In[7]:= K1 = Knot["K11n34"]; K2 = Knot["K11n42"]; test[invt_] := (invt[K1] =!= invt[K2]); test /@ {Alexander, MultivariableAlexander, Jones, HOMFLYPT, Kauffman, Kh, HFKHat}
Out[7]= {False, False, False, False, False, False, True}

Indeed,

In[8]:= {HFKHat[K1][t, m], HFKHat[K2][t, m]}
Out[8]= 2 1 1 3 3 3 3 {3 + - + ----- + ----- + ----- + ----- + ---- + --- + 3 t + 3 m t + m 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 m t m t m t m t m t m t 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 m t + 3 m t + m t + m t , 6 1 1 4 4 2 2 2 7 + - + ----- + ----- + ---- + --- + 4 t + 4 m t + m t + m t } m 3 2 2 2 2 m t m t m t m t