Heegaard Floer Knot Homology
In 2007, Jean-Marie Droz of the University of Zurich (working along with Anna Beliakova) wrote a Python program to compute the (hat-version) Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology of a knot . His program is integrated into KnotTheory`
, though to run it, you must have Python as well as the Python library Psycho installed on your system.
(For In[1] see Setup)
|
|
The Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology is a categorification of the Alexander polynomial. Let us test that for the knot 8_19:
In[3]:=
|
hfk = HFKHat[K = Knot[8, 19]][t, m]
|
Out[3]=
|
2 -3 m 5 2 6 3
m + t + -- + m t + m t
2
t
|
In[4]:=
|
{hfk /. m -> -1, Alexander[K][t]}
|
Out[4]=
|
-3 -2 2 3 -3 -2 2 3
{1 + t - t - t + t , 1 + t - t - t + t }
|
The knot 8_19 is the first knot in the Rolfsen Knot Table whose Heegaard-Floer Knot Homology is not "diagonal". Let us test that. The homology is "on diagonal", iff its Poincare polynomial, evaluated at , is a monomial:
In[5]:=
|
Select[AllKnots[{3, 8}], (Head[HFKHat[#][t, 1/t]] == Plus) &]
|
Out[5]=
|
{Knot[8, 19]}
|
In[6]:=
|
hfk /. m -> 1/t
|
Out[6]=
|
4 -2
-- + t
3
t
|
K11n34 |
K11n42 |
The (mirrored) Conway knot K11n34 and the (mirrored) Kinoshita-Terasaka knot K11n42 are a mutant pair, and are notoriously difficult to tell apart. Let us check that an array of standard knot polynomials fails to separate them, yet succeeds:
In[7]:=
|
K1 = Knot["K11n34"]; K2 = Knot["K11n42"];
test[invt_] := (invt[K1] =!= invt[K2]);
test /@ {
Alexander, MultivariableAlexander, Jones, HOMFLYPT, Kauffman, Kh, HFKHat
}
|
Out[7]=
|
{False, False, False, False, False, False, True}
|
Indeed,
In[8]:=
|
{HFKHat[K1][t, m], HFKHat[K2][t, m]}
|
Out[8]=
|
2 1 1 3 3 3 3
{3 + - + ----- + ----- + ----- + ----- + ---- + --- + 3 t + 3 m t +
m 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 m t
m t m t m t m t m t
2 2 2 2 3 3 3
3 m t + 3 m t + m t + m t ,
6 1 1 4 4 2 2 2
7 + - + ----- + ----- + ---- + --- + 4 t + 4 m t + m t + m t }
m 3 2 2 2 2 m t
m t m t m t
|
On July 6, 2006, User:AnonMoos asked User:Drorbn if he could identify the knot in the left hand side picture below. At the time it was impossible using the tools available with KnotTheory`
(though of course, it was possible to do it "by hand"). The 2007 addition does the job, though. Indeed, we first extract the mystery knot's DT (Dowker-Thistlethwaite) Code using the picture on the right hand side below, then compute , and then search for it with the 's of all knots with up to 11 crossings:
And so the mystery knot is the Conway knot, the mirror of K11n34.