The PD
notation
In the "Planar Diagrams" (PD
) presentation we present every knot or link diagram by labeling its edges (with natural numbers, 1,...,n, and with increasing labels as we go around each component) and by a list crossings presented as symbols where , , and are the labels of the edges around that crossing, starting from the incoming lower edge and proceeding counterclockwise. Thus for example, the PD
presentation of the knot above is:
(This of course is the Miller Institute knot, the mirror image of the knot 6_2)
(For In[1] see Setup)
In[2]:=
|
?PD
|
PD[v1, v2, ...] represents a planar diagram whose vertices are v1, v2, .... PD also acts as a "type caster", so for example, PD[K] where K is a named knot (or link) returns the PD presentation of that knot.
|
|
In[3]:=
|
PD::about
|
The GaussCode to PD conversion was written by Siddarth Sankaran at the University of Toronto in the summer of 2005.
|
|
In[4]:=
|
?X
|
X[i,j,k,l] represents a crossing between the edges labeled i, j, k and l starting from the incoming lower strand i and going counterclockwise through j, k and l. The (sometimes ambiguous) orientation of the upper strand is determined by the ordering of {j,l}.
|
|
Thus, for example, let us compute the determinant of the above knot:
In[5]:=
|
K = PD[
X[1,9,2,8], X[3,10,4,11], X[5,3,6,2],
X[7,1,8,12], X[9,4,10,5], X[11,7,12,6]
];
|
In[6]:=
|
Alexander[K][-1]
|
Out[6]=
|
-11
|
Some further details
In[7]:=
|
?Xp
|
Xp[i,j,k,l] represents a positive (right handed) crossing between the edges labeled i, j, k and l starting from the incoming lower strand i and going counter clockwise through j, k and l. The upper strand is therefore oriented from l to j regardless of the ordering of {j,l}. Presently Xp is only lightly supported.
|
|
In[8]:=
|
?Xm
|
Xm[i,j,k,l] represents a negative (left handed) crossing between the edges labeled i, j, k and l starting from the incoming lower strand i and going counter clockwise through j, k and l. The upper strand is therefore oriented from j to l regardless of the ordering of {j,l}. Presently Xm is only lightly supported.
|
|
In[9]:=
|
?P
|
P[i,j] represents a bivalent vertex whose adjacent edges are i and j (i.e., a "Point" between the segment i and the segment j). Presently P is only lightly supported.
|
|
For example, we could add an extra "point" on the Miller Institute knot, splitting edge 12 into two pieces, labeled 12 and 13:
In[10]:=
|
K1 = PD[
X[1,9,2,8], X[3,10,4,11], X[5,3,6,2],
X[7,1,8,13], X[9,4,10,5], X[11,7,12,6],
P[12,13]
];
|
At the moment, many of our routines do not know to ignore such "extra points". But some do:
In[11]:=
|
Jones[K][q] == Jones[K1][q]
|
Out[11]=
|
True
|
In[12]:=
|
?Loop
|
Loop[i] represents a crossingsless loop labeled i.
|
|
Hence we can verify that the A2 invariant of the unknot is :
In[13]:=
|
A2Invariant[Loop[1]][q]
|
Out[13]=
|
-2 2
1 + q + q
|