Knot table - ten crossings: Difference between revisions
From Knot Atlas
Jump to navigationJump to search
(10 in a row; don't change unless you have a reason.) |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>This is one of the tables included into [[The Rolfsen Knot Table]]</noinclude> |
|||
==Knots with 10 crossings== |
==Knots with 10 crossings== |
||
<center> |
<center> |
||
| Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
{{Knot Table Image|10_79}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_79}} |
||
{{Knot Table Image|10_80}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_80}} |
||
|- |
|||
{{Knot Table Image|10_81}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_81}} |
||
{{Knot Table Image|10_82}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_82}} |
||
| Line 178: | Line 180: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
{{Knot Table Image|10_161}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_161}} |
||
|align=center|See<br><font color=red>warning</font><br>below |
|||
|Where's<br>Perko? |
|||
{{Knot Table Image|10_162}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_162}} |
||
{{Knot Table Image|10_163}} |
{{Knot Table Image|10_163}} |
||
| Line 186: | Line 188: | ||
</center> |
</center> |
||
In |
<font size=+1 color=red>'''Warning.'''</font> In 1973 K. Perko noticed that the knots that were later labeled 10<sub>161</sub> and 10<sub>162</sub> in Rolfsen's tables (which were published in 1976 and were based on earlier tables by Little (1900) and Conway (1970)) are in fact the same. In our table we removed Rolfsen's 10<sub>162</sub> and renumbered the subsequent knots, so that our 10 crossings total is 165, one less than Rolfsen's 166. Read more: [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PerkoPair.html] [http://www.math.cuhk.edu.hk/publect/lecture4/perko.html] [http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/~bjs/Perko-page.html] [http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~jms/Videos/ke/images.html] |
||
[http://knotplot.com/perko/]. |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:04, 12 August 2013
This is one of the tables included into The Rolfsen Knot Table
Knots with 10 crossings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See warning below |
|
|
|
|
Warning. In 1973 K. Perko noticed that the knots that were later labeled 10161 and 10162 in Rolfsen's tables (which were published in 1976 and were based on earlier tables by Little (1900) and Conway (1970)) are in fact the same. In our table we removed Rolfsen's 10162 and renumbered the subsequent knots, so that our 10 crossings total is 165, one less than Rolfsen's 166. Read more: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
